I am a postdoctoral researcher at TU Munich with a Global Postdoc Fellowship and a Senior Research Fellow at the Net Zero Lab of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. I received my PhD from ETH Zurich in 2024.
I study how climate technologies are developed, financed, and deployed around the globe, using large-scale data and AI. My work focuses on mapping innovation partnerships and financial flows between actors such as manufacturers, governments, and investors. I use this data to investigate how these interactions shape commercialization and scale-up of climate technologies and how public policy can influence these dynamics.
Current research investigating how climate technologies are developed, financed, and deployed globally, using large-scale data from public announcements
How do innovation networks in climate technologies emerge and evolve?
This project examines innovation partnerships between manufacturers, governments, research institutes, and other actors from R&D to deployment. It identifies and classifies over 4 million global partnerships based on millions of LinkedIn announcements, mapping innovation networks across climate technologies and geographic regions. It analyzes how these networks evolve in terms of structure, geography, and the roles of key actors and activities.
To what extent can public finance crowd in private investment in climate technologies?
This project examines financial flows supporting climate technologies from research and demonstration to commercialization and large-scale deployment. It focuses on public-private co-financing activities and investigates to what extent they mobilize private capital, particularly by enabling first-time investments that might not occur otherwise.
Where and how are climate technologies deployed, and which actors participate?
This project examines the deployment of climate technologies across regions. It maps where deployments take place for a granular set of 87 technologies (e.g., sodium-ion, lithium-ion batteries), measures deployed capacities (MW of solar PV and MWh of battery storage), and identifies the roles of different actors in these projects from material suppliers to end users. By linking projects to locations of participating actors, the project investigates trends in industrial capacities, regional specialization, and critical dependencies around the globe.
To what extent do firm-level subsidies create spillovers to partnering organizations?
This project examines the spillover effects of European Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) subsidies on firm collaboration networks and industrial outcomes. It measures spillovers through the innovation partnerships of subsidized firms. It analyzes how subsidies affect the formation of partnerships across innovation activities and geographic boundaries, and the extent to which they are associated with second-tier outcomes among partnering organizations, such as green job creation and deployed capacity.
Preprints of selected research currently under review
Show abstract
Climate change is increasing the severity of extreme weather events, posing substantial risks for firms, investors, and the economy. Although quantifying such risks has become increasingly important, existing approaches for estimating the impacts from extreme weather events face major limitations. Here, we propose a novel approach to identify and categorize firm-level impacts of extreme weather events from public corporate filings. Using large language models, we analyze 1.7 million filings from all publicly listed US firms (2005-2024), map identified impacts to 286 specific extreme weather events, and classify them by impact channels (direct asset vs. indirect economic flows) and directionalities (positive vs. negative). We identify 13,277 firm-event impacts and estimate that negative impacts caused a cumulative average abnormal stock return of -2.36% per event. The total firm value losses accumulate to $2.709 trillion USD (inflation-adjusted) between 2005 and 2024, which are primarily driven by direct asset impacts. Furthermore, we estimate that aggregated gains of firms that report positive impacts from extreme weather events accumulate to $327 billion USD. The highest losses are caused by severe storms and tropical cyclones and experienced by firms in manufacturing and finance. For some sectors, such as retail and construction, we find that returns recover quickly and even turn positive, potentially due to a rebound in demand after the events. Our approach allows for a systematic, firm-level quantification of physical climate impacts, enabling informed risk assessments and adaptation strategies with high granularity.
Show abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities to study human behavior, yet their rapidly evolving nature poses challenges for research rigor. GUIDE-LLM provides a consensus-based reporting checklist to improve transparency, reproducibility, and ethical accountability across behavioral and social science research. In particular, GUIDE-LLM supports researchers in clearly describing how LLMs were used, why specific methodological choices were made, and what steps were taken to ensure responsible research practices.
Show abstract
Innovation networks are essential for advancing climate technologies, yet their structure and dynamics remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we use large language models (LLMs) to analyze 26 million LinkedIn posts, mapping a global network of 166,459 organizations and 442,250 collaborations (> 2 million direct partnerships) across 189 countries. Our dataset spans 27 climate technologies and 17 collaboration types, including demonstration projects, product launches, adoption, and equity investments. We find that, between 2020 and 2024, the structure of climate-tech innovation networks has changed substantially. Following the recent wave of industrial policy, many governmental organizations shifted from peripheral supporters to central orchestrators of global innovation networks, specifically for technologies with a lack of incumbent industry acting as system integrators (e.g. geothermal energy, direct air capture, green hydrogen). Increases in the centrality of governmental organizations are associated with substantial expansions in domestic partnerships, ranging from 2.7 (concentrated solar) to 9.2 (batteries) new domestic partnerships per additional governmental partnership. At the same time, 62% of all global partnerships now arise from collaborations with government participation (e.g. via public procurement and financing), revealing a substantial structural dependence which is highest for concentrated solar (87%) and lowest for electric vehicles (55%). Our LLM-based approach provides a scalable method for continuously monitoring the structure and dynamics of innovation networks beyond climate technologies.
Research published in leading academic journals and machine learning conferences
Show abstract
Carbon markets play an important role in firms' and governments' climate strategies. Carbon crediting mechanisms allow project developers to earn carbon credits through mitigation projects. Several studies have raised concerns about environmental integrity, though a systematic evaluation is missing. We synthesized studies relying on experimental or rigorous observational methods, covering 14 studies on 2,346 carbon mitigation projects and 51 studies investigating similar field interventions implemented without issuing carbon credits. The analysis covers one-fifth of the credit volume issued to date, almost 1 billion tons of CO2e. We estimate that less than 16% of the carbon credits issued to the investigated projects constitute real emission reductions, with 11% for cookstoves, 16% for SF6 destruction, 25% for avoided deforestation, 68% for HFC-23 abatement, and no statistically significant emission reductions from wind power and improved forest management projects. Carbon crediting mechanisms need to be reformed fundamentally to meaningfully contribute to climate change mitigation.
Show abstract
To achieve net-zero emissions, public policy needs to foster rapid innovation of climate technologies. However, there is a scarcity of comprehensive and up-to-date evidence to guide policymaking by monitoring climate innovation systems. This is notable, especially at the center of the innovation process, where nascent inventions transition into profitable and scalable market solutions. Here, we discuss the potential of large language models (LLMs) to monitor climate technology innovation. By analyzing large pools of unstructured text data sources, such as company reports and social media, LLMs can automate information retrieval processes and thereby improve existing monitoring in terms of cost-effectiveness, timeliness, and comprehensiveness. In this perspective, we show how LLMs can play a crucial role in informing innovation policy for the energy transition by highlighting promising use cases and prevailing challenges for research and policy.
Show abstract
International climate finance is key to achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement. Here we develop a machine learning classifier to identify international climate finance from 2.7 million official development assistance projects between 2000 and 2019, resulting in a consistent and replicable inventory of 82,023 bilateral climate finance projects (US$80 billion). Our findings reinforce concerns that the actual numbers may be much lower than current estimates made with Rio markers.
Show abstract
Monitoring global development aid provides important evidence for policymakers financing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). To overcome the limitations of existing monitoring, we develop a machine learning framework that enables a comprehensive and granular categorization of development aid activities based on their textual descriptions. Specifically, we cluster the descriptions of ~3.2 million aid activities conducted between 2000 and 2019 totalling US$2.8 trillion. As a result, we generated 173 activity clusters representing the topics of underlying aid activities. Among them, 70 activity clusters cover topics that have not yet been analysed empirically (for example, greenhouse gas emissions reduction and maternal health care). On the basis of our activity clusters, global development aid can be monitored for new topics and at new levels of granularity, allowing the identification of unexplored spatio-temporal disparities. Our framework can be adopted by development finance and policy institutions to promote evidence-based decisions targeting the SDGs.
Show abstract
Deforestation is a major driver of climate change. To mitigate deforestation, carbon offset projects aim to protect forest areas at risk. However, existing literature shows that most projects have substantially overestimated the risk of deforestation, thereby issuing carbon credits without equivalent emissions reductions. In this study, we examine if the spread of deforestation can be predicted ex-ante using Deep Learning (DL) models. Our input data includes past deforestation development, slope information, land use, and other terrain- and soil-specific covariates. Testing predictions 1-year ahead, we find that our models only achieve low levels of predictability. For pixel-wise classification at a 30 m resolution, our models achieve an F1 score of 0.263. Only when substantially simplifying the task to predicting if any level of deforestation occurs within a 1.5 km squared tile, the model results improve to a moderate performance (F1: 0.608). We conclude that, based on our input data, deforestation cannot be predicted accurately enough to justify the ex-ante issuance of carbon credits for forest conservation projects. As main challenges, there is the extreme class imbalance between pixels that are deforested (minority) and not deforested (majority) as well as the omittance of social, political, and economic drivers of deforestation.
Show abstract
Reaching net zero emissions requires rapid innovation and scale-up of clean tech. In this context, clean tech innovation networks (CTINs) can play a crucial role by pooling necessary resources and competences and enabling knowledge transfers between different actors. However, existing evidence on CTINs is limited due to a lack of comprehensive data. Here, we develop a machine learning framework to identify CTINs from announcements on social media to map the global CTIN landscape. Specifically, we classify the social media announcements regarding the type of technology (e.g., hydrogen, solar), interaction type (e.g., equity investment, R&D collaboration), and status (e.g., commencement, update). We then extract referenced organizations via entity recognition. Thereby, we generate a large-scale dataset of CTINs across different technologies, countries, and over time. This allows us to compare characteristics of CTINs, such as the geographic proximity of actors, and to investigate the association between network evolution and technology innovation and diffusion. As a direct implication, our work helps policy makers to promote CTINs by identifying current barriers and needs.
Show abstract
To transform our economy towards net-zero emissions, industrial development of clean energy technologies (CETs) to replace fossil energy technologies (FETs) is crucial. Although the media has great power in influencing consumer behavior and decision making in business and politics, its role in the energy transformation is still underexplored. In this paper, we analyze the global energy discourse via machine learning. For this, we collect a large-scale dataset with ~5 million news articles from seven of the world's major CO2 emitting countries, covering eight CETs and four FETs. Using machine learning, we then analyze the content of news articles on a highly granular level and along several dimensions, namely relevance (for the energy discourse), context (e.g., costs, regulation, investment), and connotations (e.g., high/increasing vs. low/decreasing costs). By linking empirical discourse patterns to investment and deployment data of CETs and FETs, this study advances the current understanding about the role of the media in the energy transformation. Thereby, it enables businesses, investors, and policy makers to respond more effectively to sensitive topics in the media discourse and leverage windows of opportunity for scaling CETs.
Show abstract
Reducing inequality is a major goal of the Sustainable Development Goals. Inequality is many-sided and often appears across geographic boundaries. Urban inequality refers to inequality between urban neighborhoods. Despite close distances, it reveals considerable disparities in income level, unemployment rates, and other socio-economic indicators and is highly dangerous for democratic societies. However, little is known about determinants indicating urban inequality. Here, we propose to explain urban inequality based on point-of-interest (POI) data from the online platform Open Street Maps. For this, we leverage machine learning to predict three major indicators of urban inequality, namely, unemployment rate, income level, and foreign national rate. We evaluate our machine learning approach using POI data for neighborhoods in Paris, Lyon, Marseille, Berlin, Hamburg, and Bremen. We find: (1) POIs are highly predictive of intra-city inequality explaining up to 75% of out-of-sample variance of urban inequality. (2) POIs generalize across cities and, thereby, can help to explain urban inequality in other cities, where no socio-economic data is available. (3) Important POIs for the prediction model are, e.g., banks and playgrounds. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to show urban inequality through POIs. As such, POIs can be used to infer granular mappings of urban inequality and thereby provide cost-effective evidence for policy-makers.
Show abstract
Digitalization and digital technologies are buzzwords in today's building industry. Because of their promising opportunities to improve (among others) the sustainability footprint of the built environment, they have emerged as an important topic for policymakers, managers, and researchers. Yet, the debate is dominated by references to Building Information Modelling (BIM) and to the success of digital businesses in other industries; it thereby fails to consider other promising digital building technologies and ignores that, in the building industry, many digital technologies require alignment with buildings' physical components. For these reasons, it is unclear how the implications of digital transformation of the building industry for policy and business. In this paper, we develop a typology of digital building technologies, and categorize and assess 29 important building technologies. The substantive differences among different types of building technologies provide valuable insights into how digital building technologies affect the functioning, structure, and competition in the building industry and where digital building technologies offer opportunities to remedy the industry's sustainability footprint. Based on our findings, we offer recommendations to policy makers, companies, and researchers interested in digital building technologies.
In S. Smith (Ed.), The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024 (2nd ed.).
Munchen: acatech, Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften.
Demo video of the Climate-Tech Monitor currently under development
malte.toetzke(a)tum.de
TU Munich
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition